Mineola Water Quality & Filtration Guide

Introduction To Water Quality in Mineola

Mineola, Texas is a city in Wood County with approximately 4,515 residents served by its municipal water system. The primary water source for the city is groundwater drawn from underground aquifers. Many residents in surrounding rural areas rely on private wells for their water supply.

The water quality in Mineola presents a complex picture:

• The municipal water system meets federal compliance standards according to EPA assessment (January-March 2021)
• Despite compliance, several contaminants exceed the Environmental Working Group's (EWG) more stringent health guidelines
• Private well water quality varies significantly based on well depth, location, and proximity to potential contamination sources
• The region's geology, particularly areas with shallow bedrock, increases vulnerability to certain contaminants

The city's water infrastructure consists of the municipal system managed by the City of Mineola, while rural residents rely on private wells serviced by companies like Big Star Water Wells, A1 Water Wells, Kirby Water Resources, and Ace Waterwells & Pump Service.

Contaminants and Pollutants in your Local Water

The EWG's Tap Water Database has identified several contaminants in Mineola's municipal water supply. While most remain below EPA's legal limits, some exceed the more health-protective EWG guidelines:

Primary Contaminants of Concern:

• Bromochloroacetic acid: Detected at 2.40 ppb (142 times above EWG's Health Guideline of 0.02 ppb)
• Haloacetic acids (HAA5): Detected at 6.95 ppb (70 times above EWG's Health Guideline of 0.1 ppb, but below the legal limit of 60 ppb)
• Other Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic Acids: Including bromodichloromethane, chloroform, dibromoacetic acid, dibromochloromethane, dichloroacetic acid, total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), and trichloroacetic acid

Additional Contaminants Detected:

• Acetone
• Aluminum
• Barium
• Bromoform
• Chromium (total)
• Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
• Fluoride
• Manganese
• Methyl ethyl ketone
• Methyl isobutyl ketone
• Monochloroacetic acid
• Nitrate
• Nitrate & nitrite
• Xylenes (total)

Private wells in the Mineola region may contain additional contaminants depending on specific location factors:

• Microbiological Contaminants: Including coliform bacteria, E. coli, Rotavirus group A, Cryptosporidium, and Salmonella
• Nitrates: Particularly in agricultural areas
• Heavy Metals: Including lead, arsenic, and manganese
• PFAs: "Forever chemicals" that may affect groundwater in some areas

Explanation of Contaminants and their Problems

Disinfection Byproducts (Bromochloroacetic acid & Haloacetic acids)

Disinfection byproducts (DBPs) form when chlorine or other disinfectants react with naturally occurring organic matter in water. In Mineola's water supply, these compounds present the most significant concern based on their concentration relative to health guidelines.

Long-term health implications include:

• Cancer Risk: Studies suggest these compounds may increase cancer risk with prolonged exposure
• Reproductive Issues: Potential problems during pregnancy and fetal development
• Liver and Kidney Effects: Some research indicates possible organ damage with extended exposure

The presence of these compounds represents an unintended consequence of water disinfection processes necessary to eliminate microbial threats. While immediate health risks are minimal, chronic exposure over decades may contribute to increased health risks.

Nitrates

While nitrates in Mineola's municipal supply don't exceed health guidelines, they remain a concern, particularly for private well owners in agricultural areas.

Health concerns associated with elevated nitrate levels include:

• Methemoglobinemia (Blue Baby Syndrome): Affects infants under six months by reducing the blood's ability to carry oxygen
• Endocrine Disruption: Research suggests possible links to hormone system disruption
• Pregnancy Complications: Some studies associate high nitrate exposure with certain birth defects

Agricultural activities and septic systems are primary contributors to nitrate contamination in groundwater. Areas with shallow bedrock are particularly vulnerable to nitrate infiltration during periods of significant rainfall.

Microbial Contaminants

Private wells in the Mineola area are susceptible to microbial contamination, especially those with shallow depths to bedrock.

Health effects of waterborne pathogens include:

• Acute Gastrointestinal Illness: Symptoms include diarrhea, vomiting, cramps, and nausea
• More Severe Health Effects in Vulnerable Populations: Children, elderly individuals, pregnant women, and immunocompromised persons face greater risks

Factors increasing contamination risk include proximity to agricultural operations (particularly livestock), high density of septic systems, and periods of significant precipitation when surface contaminants can infiltrate aquifers.

Heavy Metals and PFAs

While not exceeding guidelines in municipal water, these contaminants may be present in some private wells:

• Heavy Metals: Can cause neurological damage (especially in children), cardiovascular issues, kidney damage, and other chronic health problems
• PFAs (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances): Associated with immune system suppression, hormone disruption, developmental effects, and certain cancers

Deep Dive on Well Water Quality in the Area

Wood County Aquifer System Water Quality

The groundwater resources in Mineola are part of Wood County's aquifer system, which has been extensively studied. Key findings include:

A comprehensive USGS study documented 302 wells in the region, providing data on:

• Well depths
• Water levels
• Construction methods
• Yield characteristics
• Water usage patterns

This data reveals significant variability in water quality based on:

• Geological Factors: The vertical and lateral extent of water-bearing formations affects contaminant filtering
• Depth to Bedrock: Wells in areas with shallow bedrock show increased vulnerability to surface contaminants
• Sabine River Influence: The proximity of the Sabine River affects regional hydrology and potentially impacts groundwater quality

Private well owners face additional challenges:

• Testing Responsibility: Unlike municipal water, private well testing and maintenance fall to individual owners
• Variable Monitoring: This creates inconsistency in water quality oversight across the region
• Seasonal Vulnerability: Wells show increased contamination risk during significant precipitation and groundwater recharge periods

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) monitors groundwater contamination and is required to notify well owners when contamination affecting drinking water wells is detected, providing some oversight for more serious contamination events.

Filtration Recommendations for Mineola

Based on the contaminants identified in Mineola's water supply, a strategic approach to filtration can effectively address water quality concerns for both municipal users and private well owners.

For Municipal Water Users

Municipal water in Mineola requires filtration primarily focused on disinfection byproducts:

• Activated Carbon Filtration: Highly effective for reducing:
  • Bromochloroacetic acid
  • Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
  • Trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
  • Chlorine
  • VOCs and some pesticides
• Reverse Osmosis Systems: Provide comprehensive filtration for:
  • All disinfection byproducts
  • Nitrates
  • Heavy metals
  • Most other contaminants down to 0.0001 microns

For most households on municipal water, a combined approach using activated carbon followed by reverse osmosis offers the most comprehensive protection, though standalone activated carbon systems will address the primary contaminants of concern.

For Private Well Owners

Private well owners should base treatment decisions on individual well test results, but considering regional risk factors, these approaches are recommended:

• Regular Testing Protocol:
  • Basic testing for bacterial contamination and nitrates annually
  • Comprehensive testing every 3-5 years or when water characteristics change
• Multi-Barrier Treatment Approach:
  • Disinfection Systems: UV treatment or chlorination for bacterial contamination
  • Sediment Filtration: As pre-treatment, especially for wells affected by surface water infiltration
  • Activated Carbon: For organic contaminants and improving taste/odor
  • Reverse Osmosis: For comprehensive treatment of multiple contaminants
  • Specialized Filtration: For specific issues like arsenic or radionuclides based on test results

Effectiveness Comparison for Key Contaminants

Implementation Recommendations

For optimal water quality improvement in Mineola:

• Municipal Water Users: At minimum, install NSF-certified activated carbon filtration to address disinfection byproducts
• Private Well Owners: Conduct comprehensive water testing before selecting treatment systems
• Vulnerable Populations: Households with infants, pregnant women, elderly, or immunocompromised individuals should prioritize comprehensive filtration
• Seasonal Considerations: Private well owners should be particularly vigilant during periods of significant rainfall when contamination risk increases

By implementing appropriate filtration technologies, Mineola residents can effectively address identified contaminants, providing water quality that exceeds regulatory minimums and offers enhanced protection for long-term health.

‍